When he reported his Bigfoot sighting I thought well OK, but when he described it as a “Weird Naked Chick” he got my attention. TM
by J. Heath R:
There are a few (locations). Location seems to be a factor. The main reason that I was confused was because my mother, grandmother, and aunt had habitual encounters in Missouri when my mother was 12. I grew up hearing about those and they all said that it looked like what was on the P/G film but more massive. The only inconsistency was that my mother said the eyeshine was amber, and my grandmother said red. (My mother saw it up close a few days before my grandmother). In time, I started becoming skeptical of the story, but I could not outright disbelieve it as everyone backed it. There was, “Glowing eyes” and a bad stench. (But not like “Wet dog”. More like extreme funk)
In my case, there was no eyeshine and if she had it, I could not see it as the floodlights hazed out anything above her breasts (which were level with my forehead). I also detected no smell and her proportions were more like ours. (Arms didn’t seem to be excessively long). As I said, when she approached her silhouette looked like a naked woman until she reached the fence and was illuminated by the floodlights. (Floodlights sat on top of the fence posts to illuminate the perimeter.)
The word “Sasquatch” never even came to my mind until I was giving my report to the Major who was in charge of that post. I first said “Weird Naked Chick” and he said, “Excuse me???” I then sort of said the word “Sasquatch”, as soon as it dawned on me out loud. He then said “Oh… So nothing happened then.” I began to repeat what I said, and he cut me off with “So nothing happened then!” In the tone of an order. (There was no ridicule nor anything condescending in his voice the first time he said it, like there was when I said “Weird Naked Chick.” He knew!
Editors Note: See the frame from the Patterson film that depicts a female Bigfoot.
The vocals that she made sounded similar to the “Puyallup Screamer” and EXACTLY like the Kalamath screams. I then started noticing that the vocals are different in different parts of the country, as are the reported descriptions and behavior. We seem to be calling at least four different hominids “Bigfoot/Sasquatch”. The footprints are not even the same morphology.
At the time, the “Experts” were saying they were bipedal apes descended from or remnants of Gigantopithicus blaci. But my mother saw the face up close in her encounter and said that it “Looked like an ugly man covered in dense hair” and what I saw was defiantly not an ape.
After I started taking Anthropologyclasse in college, I am convinced that they are the very same guys on fossil record. (The “Extinct” human species.) Their footprints are exact matches to the fossilized prints of our “Extinct” cousins. Unlike dinosaurs, there is zilch evidence that they ever went extinct. They base this off the fossil record. However, Homo erectus and Homo heidlebergensis both left the fossil record only to return a few million years later in another fossil-friendly location. Most of the ecosystems on the planet do not allow fossilization to occur, and jungles, forests, and swamps do not allow dead organisms to last long. The entire U.S. is like that. We have archaeological evidence of a whole race of people who lived here during the Ice Age (The Clovis) but not one single body. Our soil is too acidic. What ice age fossils we do have, are from permafrost, ash flows, or tarpits… I digress
Most Native Americans that have Sasquatch in their lore, usually have three types (one is always evil or a “Canible” as they are viewed as people.) While I don’t think they are all vicious monsters, I also do not think they should be viewed as “Gentle Giants either. Most of the Reports coming out of the South are of hostile creatures. If they are all in genus Homo, then they have the potential to be just as evil as we are.
